Tailored Relief: How Age, KL Grade, and Diabetes Shape PAAG Outcomes in Knee Osteoarthritis

John Davies
John Davies
Published at: 18/8/2025

Tailored Relief: How Age, KL Grade, and Diabetes Shape PAAG Outcomes in Knee Osteoarthritis

Introduction

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common condition that wears down joint cartilage over time, leading to pain and stiffness—especially for older adults. One newer treatment option, polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAAG) injections, offers a minimally invasive way to relieve symptoms by improving joint lubrication and cushioning. However, people respond differently to PAAG, and recent research reveals that factors such as age, the severity of knee damage (measured by the Kellgren-Lawrence, or KL, grade), and diabetes status can significantly affect treatment results. Understanding these factors is key to personalizing care and getting the best possible outcomes, particularly for those dealing with OA in both knees.

How Age Influences PAAG Treatment Success

Age has a meaningful impact on how well patients respond to PAAG injections. Interestingly, older adults often report greater improvements in pain and function after treatment than their younger counterparts. This may seem surprising, but it shows that PAAG can offer particular benefits for those most affected by knee OA. By identifying patients whose age makes them more likely to see positive results, doctors can better match individuals to the treatments that will help them the most.

The Role of Knee Damage Severity and Diabetes

The severity of osteoarthritis, measured by the KL grade, is another important factor. This grading system assesses joint damage from mild to severe using X-ray images. People with less severe OA (lower KL grades) generally respond better to PAAG because there is still enough healthy tissue for the hydrogel to support and protect. As joint damage becomes more advanced, the effectiveness of the treatment tends to decrease.

Diabetes status also impacts outcomes. Patients without diabetes typically experience better results from PAAG injections. This may be because diabetes is linked to higher levels of inflammation and slower healing, which can limit the benefits of the treatment. Additionally, recent findings suggest that individuals with OA in both knees (bilateral OA) might experience greater improvements than those with only one knee affected, possibly because they have more overall joint discomfort that PAAG can help relieve.

Personalizing Treatment for Better Results

By bringing together these insights, clinicians can take a more personalized approach to managing knee OA with PAAG injections. Considering a patient's age, KL grade, and diabetes status helps predict who is most likely to benefit, allowing doctors to tailor treatments more effectively.

For example, older adults without diabetes and with milder knee damage are often excellent candidates for PAAG, as they are more likely to experience meaningful pain relief and better mobility. This personalized approach improves outcomes and also avoids unnecessary procedures for patients who are less likely to benefit.

As research advances, we can look forward to further refining these recommendations. Ongoing studies will incorporate other patient factors and follow individuals longer term, moving us closer to a future where knee OA care is even more precisely matched to each person's needs.

Conclusion

In summary, age, severity of knee damage, and diabetes status are key factors influencing how well PAAG injections work for knee osteoarthritis. Taking these into account allows healthcare providers to offer more individualized treatments, leading to greater relief and improved quality of life for patients. As we learn more, personalized treatment for knee OA will only become more effective, bringing hope to those affected by this common and often limiting condition.

References

Gao, H. C. K., Akhtar, M., Creedon, C., Nar, Ö. O., Verma, T., & Lee, P. Y. F. (2025). Polyacrylamide hydrogel injections in knee osteoarthritis: A PROMs-based 24 month cohort study. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, Article 103136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103136

Legal & Medical Disclaimer

This article is written by an independent contributor and reflects their personal opinions and professional experience. It does not necessarily represent the views of MSK Doctors. All guest submissions are published in good faith, and MSK Doctors does not verify the accuracy of claims, the clinical content, or the legal ownership of any images or media submitted.

The content is intended for general informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with a qualified healthcare professional. Readers should not rely on the information in this article to diagnose or treat any medical condition. Always seek personalised medical guidance from a licensed clinician before making health-related decisions.

The responsibility for ensuring that all text, data, and images comply with copyright, privacy, and data protection laws lies solely with the article’s author. MSK Doctors takes no responsibility for third-party content and will act promptly to remove any material found to be inappropriate, inaccurate, or in breach of regulations.

MSK Doctors accept no liability for any loss, damage, or injury resulting from the use of or reliance on content published on this site. By accessing this article, you agree to these terms.

If you believe this content breaches any rights or contains inaccurate information, please contact us at webmaster@mskdoctors.com.

More Articles
All Articles
Specialties