Specialties
Cartilage
Specialties
Cartilage Repair
Specialties
General MSK
Specialties
Knee
776 results found in 25ms
MACI versus microfracture for knee cartilage repairMACI versus microfracture for knee cartilage repair
MACI outperforms microfracture for knee cartilage defects of 3 cm² or larger, according to the SUMMIT randomised trial, which found significantly greater improvements in pain and function at two years that persisted through five years.MACI outperforms microfracture for knee cartilage defects of 3 cm² or larger, according to the SUMMIT randomised trial, which found significantly greater improvements in pain and function at two years that persisted through five years.
AMIC vs microfracture for knee cartilage repairAMIC vs microfracture for knee cartilage repair
Both AMIC and microfracture improve pain and function in the first two years; beyond that point, microfracture outcomes progressively deteriorate whilst AMIC maintains stable gains through a decade of follow-up.Both AMIC and microfracture improve pain and function in the first two years; beyond that point, microfracture outcomes progressively deteriorate whilst AMIC maintains stable gains through a decade of follow-up.
ACI knee cartilage repair in the UKACI knee cartilage repair in the UK
ACI harvests a patient's own cartilage cells, cultures them to roughly 20 times their original number, then implants them in a second operation; NHS funding applies only to patients with defects over 2 cm², no prior cartilage repair, minimal arthritis, and access to a specialist centre.ACI harvests a patient's own cartilage cells, cultures them to roughly 20 times their original number, then implants them in a second operation; NHS funding applies only to patients with defects over 2 cm², no prior cartilage repair, minimal arthritis, and access to a specialist centre.
Is OATS knee surgery worth itIs OATS knee surgery worth it
Cartilage damage beyond a certain point cannot self-repair. OATS transplants healthy cartilage plugs to replace it, with 85–93% achieving clinical success and improvements sustained at ten and twenty years, though 10–15% experience persistent donor-site pain.Cartilage damage beyond a certain point cannot self-repair. OATS transplants healthy cartilage plugs to replace it, with 85–93% achieving clinical success and improvements sustained at ten and twenty years, though 10–15% experience persistent donor-site pain.
ACI vs MACI for knee cartilage repairACI vs MACI for knee cartilage repair
MACI seeds harvested chondrocytes onto a collagen membrane secured with fibrin glue; first-generation ACI injects them as a liquid suspension under a sutured periosteal patch. This engineering difference has driven MACI's adoption: complication rates of approximately 10% versus 29%, with superior pain reduction and activity levels.MACI seeds harvested chondrocytes onto a collagen membrane secured with fibrin glue; first-generation ACI injects them as a liquid suspension under a sutured periosteal patch. This engineering difference has driven MACI's adoption: complication rates of approximately 10% versus 29%, with superior pain reduction and activity levels.
Allograft or Autograft for Large Knee Cartilage DefectsAllograft or Autograft for Large Knee Cartilage Defects
Defect size is the primary determinant in knee cartilage repair: below 4 cm², autograft transfer from low-load zones is standard; above that threshold, cadaveric allograft removes the biological supply ceiling.Defect size is the primary determinant in knee cartilage repair: below 4 cm², autograft transfer from low-load zones is standard; above that threshold, cadaveric allograft removes the biological supply ceiling.
Single-stage or two-stage cartilage repairSingle-stage or two-stage cartilage repair
Cartilage repair decisions hinge on defect size: lesions below roughly 1.5–2 cm² suit single-stage surgery, those of 2–4 cm² permit either approach, and larger defects typically require tissue replacement rather than repair.Cartilage repair decisions hinge on defect size: lesions below roughly 1.5–2 cm² suit single-stage surgery, those of 2–4 cm² permit either approach, and larger defects typically require tissue replacement rather than repair.
MACI vs Microfracture for Knee Cartilage RepairMACI vs Microfracture for Knee Cartilage Repair
For focal knee cartilage defects above 3 cm², MACI outperformed microfracture across all clinical measures: pain scores improved to 82.5 versus 70.9 at two years, with durability sustained at five-year follow-up.For focal knee cartilage defects above 3 cm², MACI outperformed microfracture across all clinical measures: pain scores improved to 82.5 versus 70.9 at two years, with durability sustained at five-year follow-up.
Cartilage repair or knee replacementCartilage repair or knee replacement
The choice between cartilage repair and knee replacement hinges on whether damage is focal or diffuse. Isolated defects in otherwise healthy joints can be repaired; widespread bone-on-bone osteoarthritis affecting multiple compartments requires replacement instead.The choice between cartilage repair and knee replacement hinges on whether damage is focal or diffuse. Isolated defects in otherwise healthy joints can be repaired; widespread bone-on-bone osteoarthritis affecting multiple compartments requires replacement instead.
STACi vs MACI for knee cartilage repairSTACi vs MACI for knee cartilage repair
STACi performs knee cartilage repair in one operation by combining bone-marrow stem cells with patient chondrocytes on a three-dimensional scaffold — differing from MACI in cell composition and scaffold structure, though lacking randomised-trial evidence for long-term durability.STACi performs knee cartilage repair in one operation by combining bone-marrow stem cells with patient chondrocytes on a three-dimensional scaffold — differing from MACI in cell composition and scaffold structure, though lacking randomised-trial evidence for long-term durability.
Recovery After OATS for Ankle Cartilage RepairRecovery After OATS for Ankle Cartilage Repair
OATS (osteochondral autograft transfer) replaces damaged ankle cartilage and bone with a healthy graft from the knee, producing hyaline-like tissue rather than scar tissue; at ten years, graft survival reached 94.9% and functional scores improved from 51.9 to 75.3, though donor-site morbidity affected 6.7–10.8%.OATS (osteochondral autograft transfer) replaces damaged ankle cartilage and bone with a healthy graft from the knee, producing hyaline-like tissue rather than scar tissue; at ten years, graft survival reached 94.9% and functional scores improved from 51.9 to 75.3, though donor-site morbidity affected 6.7–10.8%.
ACI vs MACI for knee cartilage repairACI vs MACI for knee cartilage repair
Both ACI and MACI for knee cartilage repair follow a two-stage structure: cartilage biopsy with laboratory expansion, then implantation. The difference lies in the second stage's delivery mechanism—ACI injects expanded cells beneath a periosteal patch, while MACI pre-seeds them onto a collagen membrane secured with fibrin glue.Both ACI and MACI for knee cartilage repair follow a two-stage structure: cartilage biopsy with laboratory expansion, then implantation. The difference lies in the second stage's delivery mechanism—ACI injects expanded cells beneath a periosteal patch, while MACI pre-seeds them onto a collagen membrane secured with fibrin glue.
776 results found in 25ms