Tags
cartilage transplant
7 results found in 52ms
  • ‹‹
  • 1
  • ››
ChondroFiller injection versus cartilage surgeryChondroFiller injection versus cartilage surgery
ChondroFiller injection achieves 30 IKDC improvement with 3–8% reoperation and 0% complications; microfracture carries 41% reoperation rates with declining long-term outcomes; ACI/MACI matches functional gains but brings 17% complications and 37% reoperation.ChondroFiller injection achieves 30 IKDC improvement with 3–8% reoperation and 0% complications; microfracture carries 41% reoperation rates with declining long-term outcomes; ACI/MACI matches functional gains but brings 17% complications and 37% reoperation.
ACI or MACI for knee cartilage repairACI or MACI for knee cartilage repair
Both ACI and MACI require two operations: stage-1 biopsy yields too few chondrocytes for immediate repair, so stage-2 implantation must follow 3–6 weeks of laboratory expansion.Both ACI and MACI require two operations: stage-1 biopsy yields too few chondrocytes for immediate repair, so stage-2 implantation must follow 3–6 weeks of laboratory expansion.
Osteochondral Allograft for Post-Traumatic Knee DefectsOsteochondral Allograft for Post-Traumatic Knee Defects
When post-traumatic knee injury damages both cartilage and underlying bone, osteochondral allograft transplants provide a single-stage solution that other repair methods cannot match. Roughly 75–82% of patients return to sport; grafts show 87% survival at five years, declining to 68% at twenty.When post-traumatic knee injury damages both cartilage and underlying bone, osteochondral allograft transplants provide a single-stage solution that other repair methods cannot match. Roughly 75–82% of patients return to sport; grafts show 87% survival at five years, declining to 68% at twenty.
Single-stage or two-stage cartilage repairSingle-stage or two-stage cartilage repair
Cartilage repair decisions hinge on defect size: lesions below roughly 1.5–2 cm² suit single-stage surgery, those of 2–4 cm² permit either approach, and larger defects typically require tissue replacement rather than repair.Cartilage repair decisions hinge on defect size: lesions below roughly 1.5–2 cm² suit single-stage surgery, those of 2–4 cm² permit either approach, and larger defects typically require tissue replacement rather than repair.
Autograft or allograft for large knee cartilage defectsAutograft or allograft for large knee cartilage defects
Knee cartilage defects smaller than roughly 2 cm² are typically repaired with the patient's own tissue; larger defects require fresh donor grafts because the knee lacks sufficient low-load surface to harvest from safely.Knee cartilage defects smaller than roughly 2 cm² are typically repaired with the patient's own tissue; larger defects require fresh donor grafts because the knee lacks sufficient low-load surface to harvest from safely.
When cartilage repair is the right choiceWhen cartilage repair is the right choice
Cartilage repair succeeds for a focal defect in otherwise healthy joint tissue in younger patients, but fails in diffuse arthritis. Lesion size, depth, patient age, and activity level determine the appropriate technique.Cartilage repair succeeds for a focal defect in otherwise healthy joint tissue in younger patients, but fails in diffuse arthritis. Lesion size, depth, patient age, and activity level determine the appropriate technique.
When OATS mosaicplasty beats other ankle cartilage repairsWhen OATS mosaicplasty beats other ankle cartilage repairs
Lesions exceeding 150 mm² require OATS mosaicplasty: marrow stimulation produces fibrocartilage that breaks down within two to three years, whilst transplanted hyaline cartilage lasts decades.Lesions exceeding 150 mm² require OATS mosaicplasty: marrow stimulation produces fibrocartilage that breaks down within two to three years, whilst transplanted hyaline cartilage lasts decades.
7 results found in 52ms
  • ‹‹
  • 1
  • ››