Reassessing the Timeline: How PAAG Could Delay the Need for Total Knee Replacement in Knee Osteoarthritis

:format(webp)/cdn.mskdoctors.com/storage/2025/8/OoVpPyEaF87QCB7rl3axK6E0gB2UXiko.jpg)
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) affects millions around the world, causing persistent pain, stiffness, and loss of mobility. For many, total knee replacement surgery eventually becomes necessary when other treatments can no longer manage their symptoms. While this surgery often leads to a dramatic improvement in quality of life, it's a major operation that involves a long recovery and potential complications. Excitingly, a newer treatment called Platelet‐rich Autologous Adipose Graft (PAAG) is showing potential to delay, or even sometimes avoid, the need for knee replacement. This article will explain how PAAG works and why it might change the future of knee osteoarthritis care.
What Is PAAG and How Does It Work?
PAAG uses a patient’s own fat tissue, enriched with platelets from their blood, to help repair damaged knee joints. In this procedure, a small amount of fat is removed from the patient’s body, processed to concentrate beneficial cells and growth factors, and then injected into the affected knee. These elements help jumpstart the body’s natural healing processes, reducing inflammation and encouraging regeneration of cartilage—the vital cushioning tissue that breaks down in osteoarthritis.
Unlike treatments that only mask symptoms—like painkillers, steroids, or hyaluronic acid injections—PAAG addresses the underlying issue. By directly supporting the knee's repair mechanisms, this approach may slow joint deterioration and improve overall function.
How Does PAAG Compare to Traditional Treatments?
Total knee replacement remains the gold standard for advanced knee OA, especially when other options no longer work. Although highly effective, it's a significant surgical commitment with months of rehabilitation. PAAG offers a minimally invasive alternative, usually performed as an outpatient procedure with a much faster recovery.
While PAAG might not provide the immediate and dramatic effects of surgery, many patients experience meaningful pain relief and improved mobility, allowing them to stay active and independent longer. This potential to delay knee replacement is especially appealing to those wishing to avoid or postpone major surgery.
Clinical studies so far have been encouraging, with many patients reporting less pain and better knee function after PAAG treatment. However, PAAG may not be suitable for everyone—especially those with severely damaged knees. Recent research has emphasized that patient selection is important, as those with more advanced osteoarthritis are still more likely to eventually require knee replacement surgery.
What Does the Future Hold for PAAG?
Though the early results are promising, PAAG is still a new therapy. More research is needed to fully understand its long-term benefits, limitations, and the patients who will benefit most. So far, most studies have had small sample sizes or relatively short follow-ups. Larger, longer-term clinical trials will be needed to confirm just how effective PAAG can be over time.
Researchers are also working on improving how PAAG is prepared and administered to maximize its effectiveness. As evidence continues to grow, PAAG could become an important option alongside current treatments—helping manage symptoms and delay the need for surgery.
In Summary
PAAG represents a promising new option for people living with knee osteoarthritis. By harnessing the body’s own healing potential, it offers the hope of slowing joint damage and postponing the need for total knee replacement. For those eager for less invasive options with fewer risks and faster recovery, PAAG could redefine the way we manage this common and challenging condition.
There’s still more to learn before PAAG becomes routine care, but its potential is clear. For many, it could offer the chance to stay active and maintain a better quality of life for longer.
References
Gao, H. C. K., Akhtar, M., Creedon, C., Nar, Ö. O., Verma, T., & Lee, P. Y. F. (2025). Polyacrylamide hydrogel injections in knee osteoarthritis: A PROMs-based 24 month cohort study. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, , . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103136
Legal & Medical Disclaimer
This article is written by an independent contributor and reflects their personal opinions and professional experience. It does not necessarily represent the views of MSK Doctors. All guest submissions are published in good faith, and MSK Doctors does not verify the accuracy of claims, the clinical content, or the legal ownership of any images or media submitted.
The content is intended for general informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with a qualified healthcare professional. Readers should not rely on the information in this article to diagnose or treat any medical condition. Always seek personalised medical guidance from a licensed clinician before making health-related decisions.
The responsibility for ensuring that all text, data, and images comply with copyright, privacy, and data protection laws lies solely with the article’s author. MSK Doctors takes no responsibility for third-party content and will act promptly to remove any material found to be inappropriate, inaccurate, or in breach of regulations.
MSK Doctors accept no liability for any loss, damage, or injury resulting from the use of or reliance on content published on this site. By accessing this article, you agree to these terms.
If you believe this content breaches any rights or contains inaccurate information, please contact us at webmaster@mskdoctors.com.

:format(webp)/cdn.mskdoctors.com/storage/2025/8/NgSUSdHRnY8Z5QQnu4A4n9eOobdYjM1D.jpg)

:format(webp)/cdn.mskdoctors.com/storage/2025/8/OoVpPyEaF87QCB7rl3axK6E0gB2UXiko.jpg)

:format(webp)/cdn.mskdoctors.com/storage/2025/8/zBuYe5N2ASrJo30haiNcG9fBKODCTeWE.jpg)
